In any case, let us move on to Baden-Baden and the Bilderberg meeting in Germany in 1991. Among the hundred or so who attended the Meeting were David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission and former Chairman of the Chase Manhattan Bank; Henry Kissinger, former US Secretary of State; Giovanni Angelli, owner of the Fiat Automobile Company in Italy; Wilfried Martens, Prime Minister of Belgium; Ruud F. M. Lubbers, Prime Minister of the Netherlands; Lord Carrington, former Secretary General of NATO; Karl Otto Pohl, President of the Deutsche Bundesbank; Arthur Dunkel, Director General of the General Agreement on Tariff and Trade (GATT); Jacques Santer, Prime Minister of Luxembourg; Her Majesty the Queen of Spain; Her Majesty the Queen of the Netherlands; Manfred Woerner, Secretary General of NATO; John R. Galvin, Supreme Allied Commander of Europe; Narcis Serra, Deputy Prime Minister of Spain; and among the six Canadian delegates Conrad Black, more surprisingly Michael Wilson (then Minister of Industry, Science and Technology, and International Trade), and even more surprisingly the 'darling'of the University of Toronto administration, Chemistry Professor John Polanyi.
Prior to his appearance in Baden-Baden, Polanyi had been awarded the Prize that is - of all the prizes in the world - the most camouflaged in respectability, but which has been made possible by the bloodshed of millions - yes, the Nobel Prize. Alfred Nobel was the most notorious and extensive dealer in arms the world has ever known.
At roughly the same moment in time that Polanyi was privy to the plans for a Third World War, I was also in Europe with Elizabeth Elliott, participating in the European City of Culture Festival, in a painting exhibition at the Guinness Gallery in Dublin and in a performance at the Abbey Theatre of my new poem Nato and the Warsaw Pact Are One, striking out intuitively against what I was convinced was forming in the world around me: a new world order. My academic life has never been free from harassment since that performance, or indeed since I wrote that poem.
Before I go on to document this, I should give some indication of what my colleague, Professor Polanyi, was experiencing in the secluded Black Forest resort town of Baden-Baden.
Banking czar David Rockefeller gave the opening address, expressing his special gratitude to the leading American newspapers for putting a wall of silence round what he and 'The Alliance' (that is the way the Bilderbergers referred to themselves at Baden-Baden) were planning for humanity. Then they reviewed their agenda for the unity of Europe, their plans for a common European currency and a central European bank organized along the same lines as the blatantly corrupt Federal Reserve. In terms of finance and economics, events in the Middle East and the Soviet Union were reviewed and the status and economic prospects of Eastern Europe were assessed. Then the discussion turned to WAR:
BADEN-BADEN, Germany - The Bilderberg group plans another war within five years.
This grim news came from a 'main pipeline' - a high-ranking Bilderberg staffer who secretly cooperated with our investigation - behind the guarded walls of the Badischer Hof, who was operating from inside with colleagues serving as 'connecting pipelines.'
The main pipeline met at least once daily, and sometimes twice, with The SPOTLIGHT as the annual secret meeting of the world elite took place June 7-9 in this resort town.
While war plans were being outlined in 'Bilderbergese', the air traffic controller at Baden-Baden' private airport reported numerous incoming flights from Brussels, where NATO headquarters are based and Secretary of State James Baker was, at the moment, promising aid to the Soviet Union.
Aboard one of those planes, en route to the Bilderberg meeting, was Manfred Woemer, NATO's general secretary.
It was repeatedly stated at the Bilderberg meeting that there will be 'other Saddams' in the years ahead who must be dealt with swiftly and efficiently.
What the Bilderberg group intends is a global army at the disposal of the United Nations, which is to become the world government to which all nations will be subservient by the year 2000.A UN ARMY
Crucial to making the UN a strong world government, by ‘osmosis’, in the words of some Bilderberg participants, is to bestow it with 'enforcement powers'.
'A UN army must be able to act immediately, anywhere in the world, without the delays involved in each country making its
own decision whether to participate, based on parochial considerations,' said Henry Kissinger during one of the forums.
Kissinger and others expressed pleasure over the conduct of the Persian Gulf war, stressing that it had been sanctioned by the UN, at the request of President George Bush, himself a Trilateral luminary, before the issue was laid before the US Congress.
The fact that the president would make his case to the UN first, when the Constitution empowers only Congress to declare war, was viewed as a significant step in 'leading Americans away from nationalism.'
If Americans can be persuaded to surrender war-making decisions to the UN, and let their young men die wearing a UN uniform, fighting under a UN flag, 'parochial nationalism' in Britain, France and elsewhere will disappear, Bilderberg speakers said.
'The Persian Gulf venture has advanced the cause by years,' one speaker said. Americans, so reluctant to commit their flag to foreign battlefields after 58,000 perished in the ill-fated Vietnam War, have had their attitude 'completely turned around,' he said.
It was 'good psychology' for Bush to allow congressional and other leaders to express their fear of losing 20,000 to 40,000 American lives, he said, when Bush knew the loss of life would be much lower.
When the allied casualty toll reached 'only 378' and Americans read and heard of 'only four' Americans dying in a week of ground war, it 'was like nobody had died at all,' one said, 'and Americans enjoyed it like an international sporting match.'
Such an adventure was essential to getting Americans into 'the right frame of mind for the years ahead,' said another (Spotlight, Washington, September 1991).
Is this the Third World War in the twentieth century that the Illuminati predicted - if that is the word - more than one hundred years ago? I quote Des Griffin in The New World Order and the T'hrone of the antiChrist (pp.14-5) which provides full documentation on the point I made at the beginning of this article:
Having consolidated their financial grip on most of the European nations by the middle of the last century, the International Bankers worked feverishly to extend their sphere of influence to the ends of the earth.
In the decades that followed, it became apparent that, in order to achieve their goal of world domination, they would have to instigate a series of world wars which would result in the levelling of the old world order in preparation for the construction of the New World Order. This plan was outlined in graphic detail by Albert Pike, the Sovereign Grand Commander of the
Ancient Scottish Rite of Freemasonry and the top Illuminist in America, in a letter of Giuseppe Mazzini dated August 15,1871. Pike stated that the first world war was to be fomented in order to destroy Czarist Russia - and to place that vast land under the direct control of Illuminati agents. Russia was then to be used as a 'bogey man' to further the aims of the Illuminati worldwide.
World War II was to be fomented through manipulation of the differences that existed between the German Nationalists and the Political Zionists. This was to result in an expansion of Russian influence and the establishment of the state of Israel in Palestine.
The Third War was planned to result from the differences stirred up by Illuminati agents between the Zionists and the Arabs. The conflict was planned to spread worldwide. The Illuminati, said the letter, planned to 'unleash the Nihilists and Atheists' and 'provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody of turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world
minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass [direction], anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought
finally out in the public view, a manifestation which will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.
In Baden-Baden Germany in 1991 the Bilderbergers planned another war, World War III. Professor John Polanyi from the University of Toronto was at that meeting as part of the planning group. Significantly, too, Baden-Baden Germany is one of the home bases of the Canadian Army in Europe. My question is: was Polanyi in Germany on his own steam or was he there as a representative of the University of Toronto?
He could hardly have been there on his own steam when over 99.9% of the rest of the world were excluded? In any case, he would scarcely have failed to draw his participation in such a 'distinguished' gathering to the attention of the same University of Toronto administrators who were so solicitious of his being awarded the Nobel Prize: indeed, one of the 'rules' at the University is to report one's participation in ALL conferences. So then, Professor John Polanyi's presence at the Bilderberger Conferences could be taken as representation from Canada's once premiere University, or if not that, at least as representation of the body which the University clearly serves (as I know from my own experiences there during the last ten years).
Are not Professor Polanyi, therefore, and the administration of The University of Toronto guilty of nothing less than treason in this country of mine - of ours - CANADA?
We could ask one further question: what is the role of the Chemistry professor in planning a conflagration of the human race? Is it not to devise deadly ways of germ warfare to wipe out huge segments of a population at a time? If so, are not both the individual and the institution involved guilty of such cold-blooded crimes against humanity as to make those tried at Nuremburg look like little boys - who were guilty of grievous matter, but not of perfect knowledge or of full consent?